×

Warning

Empty password not allowed.
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC:

Bombing carrier suggestion 12 years 1 month ago #11029

  • Chan the master
  • Chan the master's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
  • PlsDontShoot
  • Posts: 226
  • Thank you received: 15
I think specific parts of the carrier should decrease the percentage of the carrier more when bombed. Becauz it take too long to bomb the carrier. Too lazy too much effort.
If you lose in the OUTSIDE, you will also lose in the INSIDE...I think

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Re: Bombing carrier suggestion 12 years 1 month ago #11031

  • Meganmae
  • Meganmae's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • you'll remember me..
  • Posts: 551
  • Thank you received: 834
I don't get your point :dry:
[/quote

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Re: Bombing carrier suggestion 12 years 1 month ago #11033

  • |111th|Kevy
  • |111th|Kevy's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 1655
  • Thank you received: 1028
Nice point Chan! A kill spot that's hard to hit would make games shorter with a good bomber and add a little spice.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Re: Bombing carrier suggestion 12 years 1 month ago #11044

  • veidar2
  • veidar2's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 773
  • Thank you received: 162
I agree. Bombing the superstructure for example could give a 15 % loss in strength instead of just 10%.

Please Log in to join the conversation.

Re: Bombing carrier suggestion 12 years 1 month ago #11054

  • Hamers
  • Hamers's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • leader of kamikazi squadron
  • Posts: 2837
  • Thank you received: 273
I'm ww2 if the carriers elevator was hit by bomb or kamikazi they would be sent back to port. That's that happened to the enterprise.
lets eat grandma. lets eat, grandma. commas save lives

Please Log in to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1
Time to create page: 0.363 seconds